🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives buried in graves vulnerable to shoreline retreat state that a lack of decision over how to address the problem is causing them avoidable anguish concerning the final resting places of their departed family.

A Looming Threat to Historic Churchyards

The council have singled out three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being swallowed by the sea in the coming decades.

A recent report on the situation sets out a series of options, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and relocating them in more secure sites. Officials maintain it is for the community to determine how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. My parents intended this to serve as their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections suggest at least part of one graveyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner remembered a childhood visit to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the sea, including its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that the deceased will just get washed out to the ocean. That is not the case. People will take bones as mementos and go plundering graves looking for valuables. That is completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Jeopardy

Along the shoreline is situated the grave of a former paratrooper who died while serving abroad. His parent said she could not sleep after learning her son’s final plot might one day be relocated.

“It does trouble me to think this won’t be his permanent resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an important place to go.”

She believes, new interments should stop but says it is premature to exhume existing graves. “My preference for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Seeking Solutions and Certainty

The lack of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the challenge has left bereaved families feeling frustrated and anxious.

Several families want more sea defences to slow the unavoidable loss and to permit funerals to continue for now. Different voices argue the time for relocation is approaching.

“The situation is very emotive,” said one relative. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And all parties is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager said the graveyards were under the care of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is up to them to decide the path to take. Our role is here to assist them through that journey with communities.”

It was also stated there was ample time to consider all the options. “This concerns many years before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no common view on what should happen yet. It requires good community discussions to discover the appropriate answers for each community.”

The possibility of the loss of the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “immense sadness for the local community,” but faith leaders also referenced a doctrine in life after death, offering a theological perspective on the physical disappearance of hallowed earth.